Obelisk 3 by John Makepeace OBE

We are delighted to announce a commission by John Makepeace OBE to make Obelisk 3, a significant new piece. Continuing his practice of creating innovative furniture of uncompromising quality, John Makepeace approached us after seeing their work at the Young Furniture Makers Awards, organised by the Furniture Makers Company in London in 2023. The resulting piece, Obelisk 3, uses innovative new techniques to produce a striking cabinet, with a blackened oak exterior and a contrasting rippled sycamore interior. Executed with an exacting level of craftsmanship the piece was recently exhibited by Sarah Myerscough Gallery at TEFAF art fair in Maastricht.

Obelisk 32024
Oak, ripple sycamore, mulberry, bog oak, magnolia and cotton velvet
148 H x 40 dia cm

John Makepeace OBE

John Makepeace OBE is internationally regarded as one of Britain’s most influential designer-makers. He was an early proponent of material innovation and sustainability, setting up the acclaimed Parnham College for furniture designers in 1977 and initiating the development of the new campus at Hooke Park to encourage closer liaison between foresters, designers and manufacturers.

John Makepeace was a founding member of the Crafts Council UK in 1975. From 1987–91 he was a trustee of the Victoria & Albert Museum, London. He was awarded an OBE in 1988 for his services to furniture design and in 2004, he received a Lifetime Achievement Award from the American Furniture Society.


Rediscovering Ancient Woodland Management: Sustainable Design Insights from the Past

The ancient woodlands of the UK, shaped by centuries of management, offer a remarkable template for contemporary sustainable design practices. Traditional methods such as coppicing provide insight into how people once worked harmoniously with nature. These time-tested practices, when examined alongside modern design thinking, inspire a return to sustainability rooted in both material stewardship and emotional durability. This article delves into the history of woodland management and explores how these ancient principles can inform ethical and sustainable design for the future.

A Brief History of Early Woodland Management in the UK

Following the last Ice Age, the once barren British landscape transformed into the lush woodlands we recognize today, populated by species such as oak, elm, birch, hazel, and lime (Taylor, 1982). However, human intervention, particularly from the early Neolithic period (4000–2400 BC), led to widespread deforestation to accommodate the growing need for agricultural land. According to environmental historian Oliver Rackham, roughly half of England had ceased to be wildwood by 500 BC due to early deforestation efforts.

“From Neolithic times onwards, parts of the wildwood, instead of being grubbed out, were evidently turned into managed woodland.” – Oliver Rackham (2001, p. 38)

Despite this large-scale deforestation, early communities developed a sustainable system of woodland management known as coppicing. Instead of simply clearing forests, they discovered that trees, when cut down to the stump, would regrow shoots that were far more useful than the original trunks. This practice not only allowed for the regeneration of forests but also provided communities with a continuous source of timber, firewood, and materials for construction.

Excavations at Flag Fen show ancient use of coppiced woods

The Ancient Art of Coppicing

Coppicing is an age-old forestry technique that involves cutting trees down to their stumps and allowing them to regrow over a set period. This cyclical process enables forests to regenerate while providing communities with a sustainable, renewable supply of wood. The practice allowed early Neolithic people to use wood more efficiently, avoiding the impracticalities of transporting and processing large, mature logs.

Evidence of early coppicing can be seen at sites like Flag Fen, near Peterborough, where thousands of sharpened wooden poles were discovered as part of a large, prehistoric wooden causeway. These poles were selectively cut from regrown trees, showcasing the early mastery of coppicing techniques (Pryor, 2015).

Coppicing continued to evolve over the centuries and became an integral part of the economy. In the 16th century, the coppice and standards method was introduced, allowing for both timber production and the regular harvesting of smaller coppiced shoots. This system ensured forests remained productive for generations, striking a balance between sustainability and economic necessity.

Coppicing and Traditional British Crafts

Coppicing was not just a practice of forestry but also an essential part of British craftsmanship. Hurdle-making, for example, involved weaving coppiced hazel wood into strong, flexible fences that were widely used across the British countryside. In the 1960s, craftspeople like those in Verwood, Dorset (Reeks, 1968), were still practising this traditional skill, passing it down through generations.

These age-old crafts played a crucial role in rural life. In addition to hurdles, coppiced wood was used to make everything from baskets to furniture, road fences to fuel for heating and cooking. The system was designed to sustain local communities, creating objects that were both useful and long-lasting.

Hurdle making in Radnorshire. Image courtesy of the Watkins Collection

The Decline of Woodland Management and Its Consequences

The First and Second World Wars had a devastating effect on British woodlands. The enormous demand for timber during wartime nearly stripped the country of its ancient woodlands. By 1945, much of Britain’s woodlands had been depleted (Bartlett, 2011). The post-war effort to rebuild saw the government favour rapid replanting programs, introducing fast-growing species like Sitka spruce and Douglas fir to meet the urgent demand for timber. However, these monocultures lacked biodiversity, diminishing the ecological value of Britain’s woodlands.

“The Woodland Trust estimates that nearly 50% of ancient woodlands that survived into the 1930s was lost during this period.” – Woodland Trust and Tickell (2000)

Today, Britain remains one of the least wooded countries in Europe, with the National Statistics Office reporting that the UK is the second-largest net importer of forest products, behind only China.

Designing for Sustainability: The Role of Emotional Durability

In the context of today’s environmental crisis, it’s clear that merely focusing on sustainable materials is not enough. Design must also address consumption patterns and foster deeper emotional connections between people and the objects they use. The concept of emotional durability, introduced by Jonathan Chapman in his influential work Emotionally Durable Design, argues for creating products that are designed to last, not only physically but emotionally as well.

“The most common response to being asked how users formed emotional attachments to products was through narrative—a personal history with the product, often related to when, how, and from whom the object was acquired.” – Jonathan Chapman (2009, p. 33)

Objects crafted from responsibly sourced wood, particularly from sustainable practices like coppicing, carry with them a narrative rooted in history and environmental stewardship. These materials tell the story of a time-honoured relationship between humans and nature, one based on mutual benefit and respect.

Change the color to match your brand or vision, add your logo, choose the perfect layout, modify menu settings and more.

A Plurality of Sustainable Solutions

“We are not looking for mass answers, but instead a mass of answers.” – Kate Fletcher (Chapman & Gant, 2007)

As Kate Fletcher writes, sustainable design cannot be a one-size-fits-all solution. Rather, it requires a variety of approaches that consider different materials, environments, and cultures.

In today’s design world, incorporating the lessons from ancient woodland management techniques like coppicing offers more than just eco-friendly benefits—it reconnects us with the past and fosters a deeper respect for the materials we use. Designing with these principles in mind helps us address both the environmental and ethical dimensions of sustainability, providing a framework for a more responsible, long-term approach to design and consumption.

Conclusion: Learning from the Past for a Sustainable Future

The history of woodland management in the UK, particularly the practice of coppicing, provides valuable insights into how we can design sustainably in the modern world. By combining ancient techniques with the concept of emotional durability, designers can create products that not only minimise environmental impact but also foster long-term emotional connections with users. This approach challenges the cycle of throwaway culture, encouraging a more thoughtful relationship with the objects we own.

At Foris Studio, we believe in the power of design to make a positive impact. By embracing sustainable materials, respecting traditional craftsmanship, and fostering emotional durability in our products, we strive to create timeless, meaningful designs that are as good for the planet as they are for the people who use them.


Design & Dislocation

“Because I know that time is always time
And place is always and only place
And what is actual is actual only for one time
And only for one place”

— T. S. Eliot, Ash Wednesday

 

When we attempt to trace the origins of ideas, particularly in design, there’s a temptation to simplify history into neat, localized narratives. We often conclude that design styles emerged because of a specific set of influences at a certain time in a certain place. However, reality is far more complex, as history is often nonlinear, interwoven with distant events and influences. 

In design, the truth is even more fluid. Rather than viewing the emergence of design styles as a local phenomenon, we should consider how distance — both geographical and temporal — plays a critical role. Design has always been global, shaped by the movement of people, materials, and ideas across borders.

This post looks at three key moments in design history to illustrate how dislocation has shaped design, emphasizing the interplay between distance and influence. As we enter a new era where localism and sustainability are prioritized, it’s worth reflecting on how the global movement of materials and ideas has long influenced the evolution of design.

1. The Thames
Woodlands & the Windsor Chair

The Thames River serves as both a connector and a boundary between London and the countryside, and the story of the Windsor Chair illustrates how a design style can emerge through a complex interplay of places, people, and materials.

Historically, furniture design often carried a distinction between town and country styles, with town furniture typically more represented in museums and historical collections. However, the Restoration of Charles II in 1660 marked a shift in English design, spurred by a reaction against Puritan restraint and the influence of foreign craftsmen who brought Continental styles to the English court.

The exact origins of the Windsor Chair are uncertain, but its roots likely stretch back to Welsh “stick chairs,” first documented as early as the 13th century in the *Laws of Hywel Dda* manuscript. The chair that we recognize as the Windsor emerged from the beech wood forests of the Chilterns in Buckinghamshire. The spindles for the chairs were turned by local craftsmen, known as “bodgers,” who worked in the woods on rudimentary lathes, producing pieces that were eventually carried along the Thames and into London’s fashionable society.

Historian Nancy Goyne Evans offers a more nuanced view, arguing that London had already established itself as a center for turnery by the time the Windsor Chair appeared in records around 1724. According to her research, London was importing large quantities of beech from the Chilterns and may have already developed the techniques necessary for Windsor Chair production. By this theory, the chair was not purely a rural creation adopted by the elite, but rather a hybrid of influences, skills, and market demands.

Chippendale Windsor with Cabriole Legs

Later, in the 18th century, Chippendale versions of the Windsor Chair emerged, illustrating the merging of country craftsmanship with fashionable urban tastes. These chairs, produced by rural artisans imitating Chippendale’s famous designs, demonstrate the ongoing interplay between town and country, with materials and influences flowing freely between the two worlds. 

 

2. The Atlantic
Mahogany Trading

The story of mahogany furniture in 18th-century Britain reveals a much darker side of design history, tied to environmental destruction and human exploitation. Mahogany, now synonymous with wealth and refinement, carries within its grain a history of colonialism and slavery.

Initially, mahogany was little more than a byproduct of the sugar plantations in the West Indies, felled to clear land for cash crops. The logs were used as ballast on ships returning to Britain, often dumped on the quaysides of major ports. However, as cabinetmakers began to appreciate the qualities of this dense, durable wood, mahogany quickly became the preferred material for fine furniture.

By the mid-18th century, leading furniture makers such as Thomas Chippendale were using mahogany extensively. The wood’s hard texture and fine grain made it ideal for carving intricate designs, which filled the drawing rooms of Britain’s wealthy elite. However, the true cost of this “luxury” material was paid by the enslaved laborers in the Caribbean, forced to fell trees in brutal conditions. Mahogany was a product of environmental devastation and human suffering, as entire forests were cleared and enslaved workers labored in life-threatening conditions, as observed by Charles Dickens and Wilkie Collins, who noted the “retrospective mirror-quality” of a mahogany desk, reflecting the horrors endured by those who harvested the wood.

Felling mahogany in Honduras

Thus, while mahogany furniture represented wealth and sophistication, its origins tell a much darker story, linking British homes to the human and environmental exploitation that fueled the transatlantic economy. The “age of mahogany,” as furniture historian Percy Macquoid called it, is inextricably bound to the wider forces of colonialism and slavery.

 

3. The Baltic Sea
Workshops, Plywood, and Wartime Europe

The story of Gerald Summers and his Simple Furniture Company in 1930s London illustrates how the flow of materials, influenced by political and economic forces, can shape — and sometimes curtail — design movements.

Summers, who began his career as an engineer, founded the Simple Furniture Company with his wife Marjorie in 1929. He quickly gained recognition for his innovative use of plywood, a material that was relatively rare in Britain at the time. Inspired by modernist movements such as the Bauhaus and the designs of Finnish architect Alvar Aalto, Summers’ furniture was characterized by its clean lines and functional simplicity.

Plywood offered unique advantages: it was lightweight, strong, and could be molded into complex shapes. Summers’ use of aircraft plywood allowed him to push the boundaries of design, as seen in his iconic Fireside Chair, which was made from a single sheet of plywood. However, his refusal to scale production or stockpile materials proved to be his undoing.

When World War II broke out, Britain’s access to Baltic plywood was severely restricted, as the material was redirected for military use. Summers’ reliance on this imported resource meant that his company could no longer fulfill orders, and by 1940, the Simple Furniture Company had declared bankruptcy.

In contrast, Alvar Aalto’s company, Artek, based in Finland and closer to the birch forests, continued to thrive. Aalto’s designs, such as the Model 60 Stacking Stool, became iconic examples of modernist furniture. The geographic proximity to resources, combined with a willingness to scale production, allowed Aalto’s work to flourish where Summers’ could not. The dislocation caused by global conflict disrupted one designer’s vision while enabling another’s success.

Design & Dislocation

These three stories — the Windsor Chair, the mahogany trade, and the rise and fall of Gerald Summers’ plywood furniture — demonstrate that design is not an isolated, local phenomenon. It is shaped by the movement of materials, the migration of people, and the impact of distant events. 

The Thames carried beech wood from the Chilterns to London; mahogany crossed the Atlantic at the cost of human suffering; plywood traveled from the Baltic to Britain, only to be redirected by war. These examples remind us that design emerges from a complex web of influences and interactions, rather than a single point of origin.

As we face new challenges in design, particularly the need for sustainability and localism, it’s crucial to remember the lessons of the past. Materials, ideas, and influences have always moved across borders, and while localism has its virtues, true innovation often comes from the interplay of the local and the global. Understanding the dislocated nature of design can help us create new models that are both environmentally conscious and open to fresh ideas.